Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • Bare Act
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

Case Laws

Case Laws

RAHUL SHARMA VS. NATIONAL INSURANCE LTD.

COURT: The Honourable Supreme Court of India. CITATION: Civil Appeal No. 1769 of 2021 DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 7th May 2021 JUDGES: Honourable Chief Justice of India Shri. N.V. Ramana, Honourable Justice Surya Kant, Honourable Justice Aniruddha Bose. PARTIES: (Appellant) Rahul Sharma & Anr. (Respondents) National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors. Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

Blue Dart Express Ltd. vs the State of Maharashtra

Facts of the Case- Blue Dart Express Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Blue Dart”) is a courier company engaged in the business of providing courier services in the state of Maharashtra. The company had filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of certain provisions of Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

DR. SUBHAS KASHINATH MAHAJAN VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

FACTS: a) 3(1)(ix)-Atrocities Act b) 3(2)(vi)- Atrocities Act c) 3(2)(vii)- Atrocities Act d) Section 182- IPC e) Section 192- IPC f) Section 193- IPC g) Section 203- IPC h) Section 219 read with section 34- IPC     5. The High Court rejected the appellant’s request to have the aforementioned complaint Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

MOHD. YOUSUF  v  AFAQ JAHAN & ANR

FACTS OF THE CASE ISSUE RAISED CONTENTION BY APPELLANT : CONTENTIONS BY RESPONDENT: JUDGEMENT In order to appreciate rival submissions section 156 of the code of criminal procedure needs to be quoted The court held that it is clear to understand, that any Judicial Magistrate, before taking cognizance of any Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

NATHU MANCHHU V. STATE OF GUJARAT, 1977

Citation: AIR 1978 Guj 49 Bench: J. D Desai, J. P Desai, J. B Mehta Decided by: Gujarat High Court Date of Judgement: 15 April, 1977 Introduction: The instant case holds an important place in the legal domain in giving a ruling that reading over of the police statement to Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

ATUL BABRUVAN KAMBLE V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

FACTS OF THE CASE The application of bail had been filed under 439[1] of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 by the respondents in front of the High Court as the accused arrested was not guilty of any crime. The incident was registered by the police officers of APMC Police Station, Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

R.P. VAGHELA V. STATE OF GUJRAT

INTRODUCTION: Contempt of court is a kind of crime of being disobedient to or disrespectful towards the court of law and its officers by the form of their behavior that opposes or defies the authority, administration of justice, and dignity of the court. There are mainly two categories that have Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

R. P. KAPUR V. S. P. SINGH AIR 1961

Case Name: R. P. Kapur and Others vs Sardar Pratap Singh Kairon and Others Citations: 1961 AIR 1117, 1961 SCR (2) 143 Court: The Supreme Court of India Bench: Das, S.K. Hidayatullah, M. Gupta, K.C. Das, Shah, J.C. Ayyangar, N. Rajagopala Date of Judgment:  28th October 1960 Parties Involved: Appellant:  Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING V. CBI & ANR.

Case Name: General Office Commanding v. CBI & Anr. Equivalent Citation: AIR 2012 SC 1890 Date of Judgement: 1 May 2012 Court: Supreme Court of India Case no.: Criminal Appeal no. 257 of 2011 Case Type: Criminal Appeal Appellant: General Officer Commanding Respondents: CBI & Anr. Bench: B.S. Chauhan, Swatanter Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago
Case Laws

NILESH DAULATRAO LAKHANI V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

INTRODUCTION: – The meaning of the word ‘cognizance’ is to “provide legal notice” or “to became aware of.” It indicates to the point where a Magistrate or a Judge first takes judicial notice of an offense. It is the line where the investigation is completed and the initial trial begins. Read more

By Admin, 3 yearsMay 5, 2023 ago

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 181 182 183 … 202 Next

Visitor Count
3887184
Users Today : 1095
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle