The Bombay High Court examines the justification for Maharashtra statutes that prevent class 10 non-science stream pupils from subsequently pursuing science.

The Bombay High Court examines the justification for Maharashtra statutes that prevent class 10 non-science stream pupils from subsequently pursuing science.

The Bombay High Court has said [Krish Rajendra Chordiya v. State of Maharashtra] that there is no justification in Maharashtra’s legislation to prevent a student from choosing the science stream after class 10 just because the student did not choose the science stream in class 10. A divisional court composed Read more

The Gujarat High Court denies Bail to the person accused of posting derogatory posts on Social Media, against PM Modi and his late mother

The Gujarat High Court denies Bail to the person accused of posting derogatory posts on Social Media, against PM Modi and his late mother

Keywords: Gujarat High Court, Afsalbhai Kasambhai Lakhani vs State of Gujarat, PM Modi, Facebook Recently, while hearing the case of Afsalbhai Kasambhai Lakhani vs State of Gujarat, the Gujarat High Court denied bail to the person accused of posting objectionable content about Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his mother on Read more

S.P. GUPTA v. UOI

FACTS OF THE CASE Various legal advisors and specialists documented writ petitions in different high courts in 1981. Each appeal had a similar issue. Every one of the petitions scrutinized an administration request with respect to the exchange of two adjudicators and their non-arrangement. The primary request was documented in Read more

RAJBALA v. STATE OF HARYANA (2015)

              RAJBALA v. STATE OF HARYANA (2015) INTRODUCTION “It is only education which gives a human being the power to discriminate between qualifications that is not irrelevant for better administration of the panchayats.” The Supreme Court on December 10 2015, rendered people desirous of contesting elections ineligible on the basis of Read more

India's Supreme Court seeks the central government's opinion on allowing bike-taxi aggregators like Rapido and Uber in Delhi, and inquiries about the insurance coverage for such services.

India’s Supreme Court seeks the central government’s opinion on allowing bike-taxi aggregators like Rapido and Uber in Delhi, and inquiries about the insurance coverage for such services.

Keywords: – Rapido, Delhi, Aggregator, Motor Vehicle Act, High Court. On Friday, the Supreme Court requested the central government to provide a response in a petition that challenges the Delhi High Court’s ruling. The High Court’s order allowed bike-taxi aggregators Rapido and Uber to operate without aggregator licenses until a Read more

Play sound