Piyush Bharat Saini vs paras Gupta

Piyush Bharat Saini vs paras Gupta Citation- CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.5325 OF 2012   Date of judgement– MARCH 11, 2013 Court- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Case type-CRIMINAL Appellant- Piyush Bharat Saini Respondent- Paras Gupta Bench- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Referred section- Section 202 Cr.P.C.Section Read more

HISTORY OF JUVENILE JUSTICE

HISTORY OF JUVENILE JUSTICE

This article is written by Diprava Ghosh of Adamas University, an intern under Legal Vidhiya Abstract –  Delinquent children are extraordinary children that display significant deviation in their social adjustment and are therefore categorised as socially deviant or socially impaired. They have been discovered to have criminal tendencies and to Read more

Legal profession not a commercial activity; lawyer's chamber does not attract commercial electricity tariff rates: Allahabad High Court 

Legal profession not a commercial activity; lawyer’s chamber does not attract commercial electricity tariff rates: Allahabad High Court 

The profession of an advocate doesn’t constitute a marketable exertion and, thus, shouldn’t be subordinated to marketable rates for electricity consumption, the Allahabad High Court recently held. (Tehsil Bar Association, Sadar Tehsil Parisar, Gandhi Nagar, Ghaziabad vs. UPERC). A bench of judges Surya Prakash Kesarwani and Anish Kumar Gupta observed Read more

The new Sebi dispute resolution process gives investors more authority: SEBI’s NEW  DISPUTE REDRESSAL MECHANISM  

The new Sebi dispute resolution process gives investors more authority: SEBI’s NEW  DISPUTE REDRESSAL MECHANISM  

 Keywords: SEBI, Investors, Dispute, Mechanism  The market regulator has been tenacious in its quest for investor justice. With SCORES, it  already has a reliable grievance redressal system in place. Beyond this, investors might turn  to IGRC if they weren’t happy with how their complaints were resolved.   But now, the Securities Read more

SUPREME COURT VACATES STAY IN A 16-YEAR-OLD CRIMINAL APPEAL; PULLS UP APPELLANT-LAWYER WHO SOUGHT REPEATED ADJOURNMENTS                     

SUPREME COURT VACATES STAY IN A 16-YEAR-OLD CRIMINAL APPEAL; PULLS UP APPELLANT-LAWYER WHO SOUGHT REPEATED ADJOURNMENTS                     

KEYWORDS: Supreme Court, Adjournments, Delhi High Court, Appellant  The Supreme Court vacated a stay order in a 16-year-old criminal appeal as it pulled up the appellant—lawyer for seeking repeated adjournments. On 19 October 2006, Gulshan Bajwa was convicted by Delhi High Court of finding him guilty of making reckless and Read more

Play sound