Citation 128 IndCas 26 Date of Judgment 03 April 1930 Court Bombay High Court Appellant Scott and Hodgson Limited Respondent Keshavlal-nathubhai shah Bench Amberson Marten, C.J. and Patkar, J. FACTS OF THE CASE The plaintiffs are appealing against the judgment of the learned First Glass Subordinate Judge of Ahmedabad Read more
Citation (1924) 26 BOMLR 595 Date of Judgment 18 December 1923 Court Bombay High Court Case Type Appeal Case Appellant Raghunath Prasad Respondent Sarju Prasad Bench Shaw, Carson, J Edge, A Ali, L Jenkins BACKGROUND OF THE CASE Raghunath prasad v/s sarju prasad case is one of the landmark cases Read more
SC quashes dowry importunity case filed by woman, says she wanted to’ inflict revenge’ The top court’s judgment came on a plea against an order of Madhya Pradesh High Court which refused to quash proceedings against the woman’s former sisters-in-law, The Supreme Court has quashed a dowry importunity Read more
Citation (2018) SCC Date of Judgment 27TH July 2018 Court Supreme Court of India Case Type Writ Petition (Criminal) No.194 of 2017 Appellant Joseph Shine Respondent Union Of India Bench Chief justice Deepak Misra, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice D.Y Chandrachud, Justice Indu Malhotra and Justice R.F. Nariman Referred Section 497 Read more
Citation (2009) SCC Date of Judgment 12TH August 2009 Court Supreme Court of India Case Type Writ Petition (C) No.535 of 2008 Appellant Avinash singh bagri and Ors Respondent Registrar IIT Delhi & Anr. Bench K.G. Balakrishnan, P. Sathasivam, B.S. Chauhan Referred Article 32 of Indian Constitution FACTS OF THE Read more
Keywords: supreme court, void, voidable, mitakshara system, hindu marriage act, hindu succession act, inheritance In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that children born out of void or voidable marriages have the right to claim a share in their parents’ ancestral property in joint Hindu families Read more
Citation 1957 AIR 628 SCR 930 Date of Judgment 04TH April 1957 Court Supreme Court of India Case Type Civil Appeal No. 134 of 1956 Appellant R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla Respondent The Union of India Bench T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar, Sudhi Ranjan Das(CJ), Bhuvneshwar P. Sinha, S.K. Das, P.B. Gajendragadkar Referred Read more
The Karnataka High Court has emphasized that the fundamental right to carry on one’s vocation, trade, profession, or business under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution cannot be limited by executive action. [Jambo Plastics Pvt. Ltd v. Chief Quality Assurance Establishment (Warship Equipment)] The right of the owner of a property to Read more
Citation (2013) SCC Date of Judgment 17TH April 2013 Court Supreme Court of India Case Type Civil Appeal No.2147 of 2010 Appellant Jatya Pal Singh and Ors Respondent Union Of State and Ors Bench Surinder Singh Nijjar and Anil R. Dave Referred Article 12, 32 and 226 of Indian Constitution Read more
Keywords: Apex Court, WFI, High Court, Sports, Elections. In a recent development that has garnered significant attention, the Supreme Court of India has declined to hear a plea of the Andhra Pradesh Amateur Wrestling Association’s to lift the interim order staying the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) elections. This decision has Read more
