The substantiation of injured witness has lesser evidentiary value and unless compelling reasons live, their statements aren’t to be discarded smoothly ”, a Bench of judges Sudhanshu Dulia and JB Pardiwala stated.

According to the learned counsel, the optical interpretation of the story lacks credibility and should be abandoned. Asgar Shaikh’s tale is doubtful because, despite his claims that he sustained a head injury during the assault, he did not seek medical attention and there is no documentation of the injury in a medical record, Read more…