Legal Vidhiya
  • Home
  • Case Laws
    • Supreme Court
      • 2010-2011
      • 2012-2013
      • 2011-2012
      • 2013-2014
      • 2015-2016
      • 2014-2015
      • 2016-2017
      • 2017-2018
      • 2018-2019
      • 2019-2020
      • 2020-2021
      • 2021-2022
      • 2022-2023
      • 2023-2024
      • 2024-2025
  • Article
  • Law As A Career!
  • Contents
    • Advocates Act, 1961
    • Administrative Law
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
    • Banking Law
    • Business Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Company Law
    • Criminology
    • Code of Civil Procedure
    • Code of Criminal Procedure
      • Bail
    • Cyber Law
    • Family Law
      • Muslim Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Law of Evidence
    • Law of Tort
    • Human Rights
    • Indian Contract Act, 1872
    • International Law
    • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
    • Intellectual Property Rights
    • Interpretation of Statues
    • Jurisprudence
    • Juvenile Justice Act
    • Medical Law
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
    • Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace
    • MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
    • NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
    • Property Law
    • Right to Information
    • Taxation Law
    • Trademark Law
    • SPACE LAW
    • SPORTS LAW
    • Unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (UAPA)
  • OPPORTUNITY
    • Internship
    • Moot
    • Call For Paper
    • Debate
    • Quiz
    • Workshop/Seminar/Webinar
    • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • About
    • Advisory Board
    • HONORARY BOARD
    • Our Team
      • FOUNDER’S
      • Executive Committee
      • Core Team
  • Youtube
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Code of Conduct
    • Disclaimer Policy
  • Contact Us

statutory interpretation

FISHER V BELL (1961)
Case Laws Indian Contract Act, 1872

FISHER V BELL (1961)

This article is written by Dhaani Gautam of 2nd Year of B. Com. LLB, of Institute of Law, Nirma University, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT In Fisher v. Bell (1961), the court addressed the fundamental distinction between an “invitation to treat” and an “offer” in contract law. The case Read more…

By Admin, 5 monthsFebruary 12, 2025 ago
MISCHIEF RULE
Interpretation of Statues

MISCHIEF RULE

This article is written by Khushita Garg of 1st Year of Army Institute of Law, Mohali, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT This article explores the mischief rule in statutory interpretation, shedding light on its often misunderstood nature and highlighting its enduring utility. Rooted in the idea of addressing the Read more…

By Admin, 1 yearFebruary 5, 2024 ago
THE LITERAL RULE AND STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION: BALANCING LEGAL CERTAINTY AND LEGISLATIVE INTENT
Article

THE LITERAL RULE AND STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION: BALANCING LEGAL CERTAINTY AND LEGISLATIVE INTENT

This article is written by Ganesh Vajrapuof 3rd semester of Alliance University, Bengaluru ABSTRACT The literal rule of interpretation is one of the oldest procedures for interpretation used by the judiciary. In India, The literal rule is a fundamental principle applied by judges in statutory interpretation. According to the literal Read more…

By Admin, 2 yearsJuly 8, 2023 ago

Visitor Count
2217522
Users Today : 3601
Click Here To Join Our WhatsApp Grouplogo

  • 4 – Week Certificate Course on PoSH
  • About
  • Advisory Board
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact Us
  • Contents
  • Core Team
  • Disclaimer Policy
  • Executive Committee
  • Founders
  • Get Published at Legal Vidhiya
  • Internship
  • Legal News Interns
  • Legal Vidhiya
  • Legal Vidhiya : A Place Where Journey Begins
  • Legal Vidhiya Upcoming Events
  • My Calendar
  • OpportunityAdda
  • Our Team
  • Prime Jurist
  • Privacy Policy
  • Research Interns
  • Section 1 of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • Terms of Use
  • The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • Virtual Internship Opportunity at Legal Vidhiya: Apply by June 28
  • Youtube
Hestia | Developed by ThemeIsle