Citation (2014) 8 SCC 273 Date 2nd July 2014 Plaintiff/petitioner/appellant Arnesh Kumar Defendant/Respondent State of Bihar Name of Court Supreme Court of India Judges Chandramauli K.R. Prasad and Pinaki Chandra Ghose, JJ INTRODUCTION The Principle of “innocent until proven guilty” remains a fundamental principle internationally recognize to safeguard the right Read more
CITATION AIR 2008 SC 2392 YEAR OF JUDGMENT 2008 PLAINTIFF Fatma Bibi Ahmed Patel RESONDENT State of Gujarat and Ors. STATUTES REFERRED IN THIS CASE Code of Criminal Procedure BENCH Lokeshwar Singh Panta , S.B Sinha INTRODUCTION The case of Fatma Bibi Ahmed Patel vs. State of Gujarat is a Read more
CITATION 1994 SCC (3) 569, JT 1994 (2) 423, 1994 DATE 11th March, 1994 COURT NAME SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER KARTAR SINGH (PETITIONER) DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. STATE OF PUNJAB (RESPONDENT) JUDGES Justice R.M. Sahai Justice S.R. Pandian Justice M.M. Punchhi Justice K. Ramaswamy Justice S.C. Agrawal INTRODUCTION: The Kartar Singh v. Read more
![R VS PRINCE [1875]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/image-6-360x240.png)
CITATION R vs Prince [1875] LR 2 CCR 154 DATE June 26, 1875 COURT NAME(COUNTRY) United Kingdom DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT Henry Prince PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER The state represented by R JUDGES Justice Brett INTRODUCTION Henry Prince was convicted under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 of unlawfully and carnally knowing (the then term Read more
CITATION 1974 AIR 1570, 1570, 1570,1975 SCR (1) 409 DATE AND YEAR 2ND 1974 COURT NAME SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PLAINTIFF STATE OF U.P DEFENDANT RAM SWARUP & ANR BENCH Y.V CHANDRACHUD, M. HAMEEDULLAH BEG, V.R KRISHNAIYER INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India’s 1974 decision in the case of State Read more
CITATION AIR 2000 SC 2798 DATE AUGUST 24, 2000 COURT NAME SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PETITIONER STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH RESPONDENT. MANGO RAM JUDGES DR. A.S. ANAND, CJ.R.C. LAHOTI AND K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. INTRODUCTION This case presents the administration of justice at the appellate stage where the Sessions court, relying Read more
CITATION Nipun Saxena Vs. Union of India, (2018) YEAR OF JUDGMENT 11 December, 2018 PETITIONER NIPUN SAXENA RESPONDENT UNION OF INDIA STATUTES REFERRED IN THIS CASE The Indian Penal Code’s Section 288A,The 1973 Code of Criminal Procedure’s Section 327,The Amendment Act of 1983 BENCH Deepak Gupta, Madan B. Lokur INTRODUCTION Read more
This Article is written by Anshika Chaddha of United University, Prayagraj, an intern under Legal Vidhya. ABSTRACT Healthcare providers operate in a highly regulated environment, and contracts inform most professional relationships whether it be employment, service, vendor, or affiliation. Understanding the legal realities of health contracts not only protects the Read more
This article is written by Anshika Chaddha of United University, Prayagraj, an intern under Legal Vidhya. ABSTRACT Healthcare law is a significantly multifaceted sector involving social determinants of health (SDOH) prevention issues together with health promotion. This study primarily explores the reasons – economic and social, health care access problems Read more
![Pre- Registration of 07- Week Certificate Course on Intellectual Propetty Rights by Legal Vidhiya [Register by 06 May. 2025]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-05-at-12.14.24_0362de31-360x240.jpg)
About Legal Vidhiya Legal Vidhiya, established in 2021, stands as a pioneering online ed-tech platform committed to nurturing legal education. Our multifaceted platform offers a comprehensive array of opportunities aimed at empowering aspiring legal professionals and enthusiasts alike. From internship to insightful webinars, interactive workshops, and comprehensive courses, Legal Vidhiya Read more
