![Anmol Kumar Tiwari Vs. State of Jharkhand [February 18, 2021]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-14-360x240.png)
CITATION Civil Appeal No. 431-434 of 2021 DATE OF JUDGEMENT February 18, 2021 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Anmol Kumar Tiwari RESPONDENT State of Jharkhand BENCH L. Nageshwara Rao,J. INTRODUCTION Indian criminal law is at stake in the case Anmol Kumar Tiwari Vs. State of Jharkhand [February 18, 2021]. Read more
EQUIVALENT CITATIONS AIRONLINE 2021 SC 269 DATE OF JUDGMENT 12th FEBRUARY 2021 COURT HON’BLE SUPREME COURT PETITIONER H.S. GOUTHAM RESPONDENT RAMA MURTHY AND ANR. BENCH JUSTICE M.R. SHAH, JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN INTRODUCTION In the Supreme Court’s H.S. Goutham Vs. Rama Murthy case the main topic of Read more
CITATION 2021 INSC 92 DATE OF JUDGMENT 16th February 2021 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences RESPONDENT Srikeerti Reddi Pingle BENCH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO of the bench comprising: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT Read more
![Mallanaguoda Vs. Ninganagouda [March 12, 2021]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-10-360x240.png)
CITATION 2021 INSC 178 DATE OF JUDGMENT 12th March 2021 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Mallanaguoda and ors RESPONDENT Ninganagouda and ors BENCH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO of the bench comprising: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT Introduction: The case of Read more
![Parmar Samantsinh Umedsinh Vs. State of Gujarat [February 24, 2021]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-5-360x240.png)
CITATION AIRONLINE 2021 SC 88 DATE OF JUDGMENT February, 24, 2021 COURT Supreme court of India APPELLANT PARMAR SAMANTSINH UMEDSINH &ors RESPONDENT STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. BENCH M.R. Shah, Ashok Bhushan, R. Subash Reddy Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s judgment in Parmar Samantsinh Umedsinh vs. State of Gujarat, Read more
The AIBE was formally launched in 2010 under the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961. Prior to the AIBE, law graduates could practice law upon enrolling with a State Bar Council. However, concerns regarding the quality of legal education and the preparedness of new lawyers prompted the BCI to implement Read more
The bar exam in the USA is a professional licensure exam that law graduates must pass to practice law in a specific state or jurisdiction. It is administered by each state’s bar association or a similar regulatory body, and the structure, content, and requirements vary across states. Most states use Read more
INTRODUCTION The Bar Council of India conducts the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) twice a year for the primary purpose of law graduates who wish to begin practicing as lawyers. The exam is given in 53 cities with 140 testing locations. The exam is given to determine the candidate’s basic Read more
Committee: General Assembly Agenda The key agenda for this program includes: Prefatory Note This Model UN conference aims to address the urgent need for legal frameworks that protect the environment from the impacts of armed conflict and reprisals. This conference will explore themes such as defining reprisals in the context Read more
Prefatory Note In recent years, technological advancements, particularly in artificial intelligence (AI), have significantly reshaped accessibility for individuals with disabilities. This international webinar aims to explore the multifaceted impact of these technologies, addressing both the opportunities and challenges they present. By bringing together legal scholars, technologists, disability advocates, and policymakers, Read more
