CITATION 2024 INSC 287 DATE OF JUDGMENT 9th April 2024 COURT Supreme court of India APPELLANT Kizhakke Vattakandiyil Madhavan (Dead) Thr. Lrs. RESPONDENT Thiyyurkunnath Meethal Janaki And Ors. BENCH Aniruddha Bose and Sudhanshu Dhulia, JJ. INTRODUCTION The case of Kizhakke Vattakandiyil Madhavan (Dead) Thr. Lrs. V. Thiyyurkunnath Meethal Janaki And Read more
CITATION Writ Petition (Civil) No. 536 of 2011 DATE OF JUDGMENT September 25, 2018 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Public Interest Foundation & Ors. RESPONDENT Union of India & Anr. BENCH Indu Malhotra, D.Y. Chandrachud, A.M. Khanwilkar, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Dipak Misra INTRODUCTION The Public Interest Foundation vs Union Read more
CITATION 1992 SCR (1) 686, 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 651, AIR 1993 SC 412 DATE OF JUDGMENT 18 February, 1992 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Kihoto Hollohon RESPONDENT Zachilhu and ors. BENCH Sharma, L.M. (J), Venkatachalliah, M.N. (J), Verma, Jagdish Saran (J), Reddy, K. Jayachandra (J), Agrawal, S.C. (J) INTRODUCTION-: Read more
A 14 year old female child was subjected to Sexual Assault. Upon which FIR was filed in Turbhe MIDC Police Station. It was noted as a Punishable Offence under Mother of the 14 Year old child moved towards the Bombay High Court seeking permission to terminate the pregnancy of her Read more
Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Sandeep Mehta granted the appeal against the judgment dated December 21, 2022, by the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore in Criminal Appeal No. 1427 of 1999, which dismissed the appellant’s appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The appellant sought Read more
The Supreme Court said that if the content of the trailer is not included in the movie then it does not amount to “deficiency of services”. It was alleged by the complainant that the service is deficient as the content shown in the movie’s trailer was not included in the Read more
In its order dated 22.04.2024, the Bombay High court rejected the bail application of the accused asked on the ground of long incarceration. The High Court sent the matter to the trial court to decide the case on merits, unaffected by any observation made by the appellate court. The case Read more
In a recent ruling, a two-judge bench comprising of Chief Justice Ravi Malimath and Justice Vishal Mishra upheld the validity of the amendment made in rule 7 of the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994. The background of the case is as follows: The petitioner Read more
Hon’ble Kerala High Court in pursuit of its action, it took up a Suo Moto case based on the report of the Project Co-ordinator, Victims Rights Centre, the Kerala State Legal Services Authority. The Report pointed out the glaring conflict in invading the Privacy of the Adopted Children. In various Read more
In the present case, the Supreme Court observed that the “Eggshell Skull Rule” was wrongly applied and enhanced the amount of compensation from Rs. 2 Lakhs to Rs. 5 Lakhs. The present case is related to the “deficiency of service” by the doctor during the surgery which results in continuous Read more
