CITATION 160 CLR 226 DATE OF JUDGMENT 11th April 1986 COURT High Court of Australia APPELLANT Con-Stan Industries of Australia RESPONDENT Norwich Winterthur Insurance BENCH Gibbs C.J., Mason, Wilson, Brennan and Dawson JJ. INTRODUCTION On June 29, 1978, Norwich submitted a winding-up order to Bedford, and it was granted on Read more
CITATION 2015 SCC OnLine NCDRC 9 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 09.03.2015 COURT National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), New Delhi APPELLANT AIR India RESPONDENT Ms. Geetika Sachdeva BENCH JUSTICE J.M. MALIK INTRODUCTION A harassed woman passenger, in possession of an open air confirmed ticket, was denied boarding a London-Delhi flight on Read more
![Taylor v Caldwell [1863] 3 B&S 826](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Screenshot-2024-01-13-125131-360x240.png)
CITATION (1863) 3 B & S 826, 122 ER 309 DATE OF JUDGMENT 6th May, 1863 COURT Court of King’s Bench (England) APPELLANT Taylor RESPONDENT Caldwell PRESIDENT Mr. Justice Blackburn INTRODUCTION The case of ” Taylor v Caldwell (1863)” The HON’BLE JUSTICE Blackburn , PRESIDING MEMBER For the Appellant Mr. Taylor. Read more
CITATION AIR 1937 All. 610 78 DATE OF JUDGMENT 11th MAY, 1937 COURT HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD APPELLANT AJUDHIA PRASAD AND ANR. RESPONDENT CHANDAN LAL AND ANR. BENCH SULAIMAN, C.J. INTRODUCTION The country’s most esteemed courts have recognised children, nearly 38% of the population, as national assets. Due to their Read more
CITATION 5861 OF 2009 DATE OF JUDGMENT 2 MARCH, 2022 COURT THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA APPELLANT STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS RESPONDENT MEHAR DIN BENCH AJAY RASTOGI, ABHAY S. OKA INTRODUCTION In the unfolding chapters of jurisprudence, a case of profound significance has emerged, encapsulating the essence of contractual Read more
CITATION [1853] EWHC J72 (QB), (1853) 2 E&B 678, [1843-1860] All ER Rep 12 DATE OF JUDGMENT 25th JUNE 1853 COURT COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH APPELLANT ALBERT HOCHSTER RESPONDENT EDGAR DE LA TOUR JUDGE LORD CAMPBELL CJ INTRODUCTION In this landmark English contract law case, Mr. Hochster sued Mr. De Read more
CITATION (1870-71) LR 6 QB 597, ALL ER REP 632; (1871) 19 WR 1059 DATE OF JUDGMENT 6TH JUNE 1871 COURT QUEEN’S BENCH APPELLANT SMITH RESPONDENT HUGHES JUDGE BLACKBURN J INTRODUCTION The case of Taylor v Caldwell stands out as a pivotal decision that shaped the doctrine of frustration. Originating Read more
O.M.P (I) (COMM) &I.A. 3697/2020 ORDER DATED April 20, 2020 COURT High Court of Delhi PETITIONER M/s Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. RESPONDENT Vedanta Limited and Another CORAM Hon’ble Mr. Justice C. Hari Shankar INTRODUCTION- ‘M/s Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. vs Vedanta Limited and Another’ is a recent case displaying the Read more
CITATION Parker v South Eastern Railway Company (1877), 2 CPD 416 DATE OF JUDGMENT 25TH APRIL, 1877 COURT COURT OF APPEAL OF ENGLAND AND WALES APPELLANT PARKER AND GABELL RESPONDENT THE SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY BENCH Mellish, Baggallay, and Bramwell, L.JJ. INTRODUCTION The legal matter of “Parker and Gabell v/s The Read more
CITIATION 1961 1 QB 31 COURT The Supreme Court of Judicature, England & Wales CLAIMANT/PLAINTIFF Ms. Elsie Ingram RESPONDENT Mr. Little JUDGE Justice Devlin LJ., Justice Pearce LJ., INTRODUCTION The case of Ingram Vs. Little is a case which led to many criticisms due to its decision. This case dealt Read more
