S.W. Palanitkar And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 18 October, 2001

S.W. Palanitkar And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 18 October, 2001

CITATION S.W. Palanitkar And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr  YEAR OF JUDGMENT 18 October, 2001 PETITIONER S.W. Palanitkar And Ors RESPONDENT State Of Bihar And Anr  STATUTES REFERRED IN THIS CASE  Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 405, 415, 420, 120BCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 BENCH D.P. MOHAPATRA &SHIVARAJ Read more

Dr. Vimla vs Delhi Administration

Dr Vimla vs Delhi Administration

CITATION  1963 AIR 1572 DATE  29th November, 1962 COURT NAME Supreme Court of India PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER Dr. Vimla  DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. Delhi Administration JUDGES Justice Syed Jaffer ImamJustice N. Rajagopala Ayyangar Justice J.R. Mudholkar INTRODUCTION Dr. Vimla v. Delhi Administration (1962) is a landmark case under Indian law discussing the topic of fraud and Read more

State Represented By Inspector Of Police, 'q' Branch Cid, Nagapattinam Vs Meeran Bai @ Syed Rahamullah @ Syed Rahamullah Meeran & Ors

State Represented By Inspector Of Police, ‘q’ Branch Cid, Nagapattinam Vs Meeran Bai @ Syed Rahamullah @ Syed Rahamullah Meeran & Ors

Citation  (2009) 17 SCC 796 or AIR 2010 SC 311 Year November 19, 2009  Court Name  Supreme Court of India (appeal from Madras High Court) Petitioner State Represented By Inspector Of Police, ‘Q’ Branch CID, Nagapattinam Respondent  Meeran Bai @ Syed Rahamullah Meeran & Ors (Syed Rahamullah Meeran, Fathima, Mohammed, Read more

STATE OF KARNATAKA    v.   KRISHANAPPA , 2000 

STATE OF KARNATAKA    v.   KRISHANAPPA , 2000 

                                                                                                           CITATION                 (2000) 4 SCC 75                                             YEAR OF JUDGEMENT                                                                                                           2000                                                           PETITIONER              STATE OF KARNATAKA                           RESPONDENT                    KRISHANAPPA         STATUTES REFERRED IN THIS CASE                     INDIAN PENAL CODE                                BENCH   HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE. A.A.S. ANAND  HON’BLE JUS. R LAHOTI,    HON’BLE JUS  S. S. VARIAVA            INTRODUCTION   The ruling in State of Karnataka v. Krishnappa (2000) was an important judgment Read more

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION HOW ADVOCATES ACT AS A CATALYST FOR LEGAL REFORM

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION HOW ADVOCATES ACT AS A CATALYST FOR LEGAL REFORM

This article is written by Piyush Kumar Das of Delhi Metropolitan Education affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has emerged as a transformative mechanism within modern constitutional democracies, allowing the judiciary to directly address social injustices that often fall Read more

Play sound