This article is written by of Anumodan Tiwari of University Institute of Legal Studies, Chandigarh University, an intern under Legal Vidhiya Introduction The landmark case of Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018)[1] was a defining moment in Indian legal history, as the Supreme Court struck down Section 497 of Read more
![Hakam Singh v. M/s. Gammon (India) Ltd. [1971] INSC 9 (8 January 1971)](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/image-159-360x240.png)
Citation 1971 AIR 740, 1971 SCC (1) 286 Date 08 January 1971 Court Name Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Plaintiff / appellant / petitioner Hakam Singh Defendant / respondent. M/s. Gammon (India) Ltd. (a construction Company) Judges Hon’ble Forum Chief justice J.C Shah and Hon’ble Justice K.S. Hegde Introduction The Read more
CITATION AIR2000DELHI141, 2000(52)DRJ437 DATE 14 DECEMBER, 1999 COURT NAME DELHI HIGH COURT PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/PETITIONER PUSHPA DEVI (APPELLANT) DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. BIMLA DEVI (RESPONDENT) JUDGES JUSTICE S. N. VARIAVA(CJ)JUSTICE S.K.MAHAJANJUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL INTRODUCTION “Delay defeats justice”, the phrase which probably can’t untie from the legal machinery but time and again Courts have tried to Read more
This article is written by Dhaani Gautam of 2nd Year of B. Com. LLB, of Institute of Law, Nirma University, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT In Fisher v. Bell (1961), the court addressed the fundamental distinction between an “invitation to treat” and an “offer” in contract law. The case Read more
![SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation Vs. Power Mech Projects Ltd. [August2021]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/image-63-360x240.png)
CITATION 2021 SCC ONLINE SC 636 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 23rd August 2024 COURT The Supreme Court of India APPELLANT SEPCO ELECTRIC POWER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION RESPONDENT POWER MECH PROJECTS LTD. BENCH Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Justice Indira Banerjee INTRODUCTION This case concerns a dispute between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (the Read more
![Union of India Vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India [July 23, 2021]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/image-62-360x240.png)
CITATION 2021 SCC ONLINE SC 483 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 23rd July 2021 COURT The Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Union of India RESPONDENT Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India BENCH L. Nageswara Rao, S. Abdul Nazeer ,M.R. Shah, JJ. INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court’s decision in the Adjusted Gross Read more
![Dr. Harish Kumar Khurana Vs. Joginder Singh [2021]](https://legalvidhiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/image-61-360x240.png)
CITATION LL 2021 SC 425 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 7th September 2021 COURT The Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Dr. Harish Kumar Khurana RESPONDENT Joginder Singh and Ors BENCH Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice AS Bopanna INTRODUCTION Negligence is simply failing to take necessary care. Medical negligence happens when a doctor Read more
CITATION 2021 SCC ONLINE SC 655 DATE OF JUDGMENT 2nd September 2024 COURT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA APPELLANT Balasubramanian & Anr. RESPONDENT M. Arockiasamy (dead) Through LRs. BENCH Chief Justice of India NV Ramana ,Justice AS Bopanna, Justice Hrishikesh Roy INTRODUCTION This case, Balasubramaniam versus M.Arokiasamy (Dead) Thr. Lrs., decided Read more
CITATION 2021 SCC ONLINE SC 538 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 3rd August 2021 COURT The Supreme Court of India APPELLANT N.S. Nandiesha Reddy and Ashok Mensinkai RESPONDENT Kavitha Mahesh BENCH N.V. Ramana, C.J., A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. INTRODUCTION The following decision is concerned with the concept of perjury. It stated Read more
Case title Devendra Kumar Pal V. State of Uttar Pradesh Citation SLP (Crl.) No. 6960 of 2021 Date of the judgement September 6, 2024 Court name Supreme Court of India Appellate Devendra Kumar Pal Respondent State of Uttar Pradesh Bench Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K.V. Vishwanathan Introduction The case Read more
