The Delhi High Court stated that the accommodation for the professors should be provided by the university as in the compensation to appoint them as Hostel warden.
- The writ petition challenging the order passed by the University to vacate the hostel rooms for the reason of pending civil works.
- The petitioner is an assistant professor, stayed in the Hostel room and she was in the post of warden.
- The petitioner is a visually challenged person, staying in a Maurice Nagar is in lack of the facilities and she faced with that accommodation various difficulties due to her disabilities.
The Court found that the University would complete the civil works within the period of four weeks as counting on this date and the university directed to vacate the professor as in the date of 15.03.2024.
The Court permitted that the respondent to file a representation to the University within the period of 10 days and directed the University to consider the representation.
Justice Subramonium Prasad Held that the University must be considered the representation of the visually challenged professor based upon the sympathy.
CASE NAME: Sharmishthaa Atreja V. University of Delhi & Ors.
NAME: Viswa ganesh K, BALLB (Hons., School of Excellence in Law, Dr. Ambedkar Law University, INTERN UNDER LEGAL VIDHIYA.
Disclaimer: The materials provided herein are intended solely for informational purposes. Accessing or using the site or the materials does not establish an attorney-client relationship. The information presented on this site is not to be construed as legal or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon for such purposes or used as a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney in your state. Additionally, the viewpoint presented by the author is of a personal nature.
