Site icon Legal Vidhiya

 BIKRAM CHATTERJI VS UNION OF INDIA 

Spread the love

 

CITATION MANU/SC/0947/2019
COURT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DATE OF JUDGMENT August 21th, 2018
PETITIONER Bikram Chatterjee
RESPONDENT Union Of India
Appeal No. 940/2017
BENCH Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra  and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday  Umesh Lalit

FACTS OF THE CASE 

• A writ petition was filed by home buyers of various projects  aggrieved by the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process being  initiated by the National Company Law Tribunal, filed by the Bank  of Baroda against Amrapali Silicon City.

• The Supreme Court after hearing the grievances of the  homebuyers and in light of the allegations of siphoning of funds  being made against the Amrapali Group, decided to take  cognizance of the Petition and ordered a Forensic Audit to be  conducted of all the entities under Amrapali Group. 

• In addition to the amarpali group,the home buyers were  challenged by Noida authority, authority said that amarpali group  has various mortgage deeds to pay, firstly they have to pay the  same then only the homebuyers will get their concerned  properties. 

ISSUES 

▪ The charges levied by officials, banks, home purchasers and  development agencies shall be valid. 

▪ The Amrapali Group’s RERA registration may be cancelled. 

▪ Form of relief accessible to homebuyers 

ARGUMENTS 

Petitioner:-The dues of Authorities cannot be treated at par with the  dues of home buyers and that the charge of the money paid by the  home buyers must be treated as the highest priority.

The Public Trust Doctrine enshrined under Article 21 of Constitution of  India is very much applicable upon the Authorities and a duty is cast  upon them to act fairly and reasonably in order to promote public good  and public interest. 

Respondent:- 

❖ The Mortgage Deed executed between the Banks and Amrapali  Group is valid and subsisting and according to the terms thereof,  the Banks have charge over the projects till the time the loan  amount is repaid. 

❖ The homebuyers are not secured creditors and thus do not have  any right, title or interest on the basis of allotment through flat  buyer agreement. 

JUDGEMENT 

➢ The RERA Registration of Amrapali Group under RERA Act shall  stand cancelled and the various projects shall now henceforth be  completed by NBCC (India) Ltd. 

➢ Authorities and Banks shall have no right to sell the flats of the  home buyers or the land leased out for the realization of their  dues and all their dues shall have to be recovered from the sale of  other properties of Amrapali Group which have been attached.

➢ The tripartite agreement and do all other acts as may be  necessary and also to ensure that title is passed on to home  buyers and possession is handed over to them. 

CONCLUSION 

The submission on the face of it appears to be attractive, but holds no  foundation for the reason that the IAs were filed by various group of  companies, including Ace Group of Companies, but they are not in any  manner concerned with the plight of homebuyers of Amrapali Group of  Companies, of which judicial cognizance was taken by this Court and  merely filing of IAs by other group of companies who are stranger to the  cognizance taken by this Court in reference to Amrapali Group of  Companies, do not deserve any indulgence at least in the instant  proceedings. 

REFERENCES 

✓ https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/judgments/announcemen t.php?WID=16090

Disclaimer: The materials provided herein are intended solely for informational purposes. Accessing or using the site or the materials does not establish an attorney-client relationship. The information presented on this site is not to be construed as legal or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon for such purposes or used as a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney in your state. Additionally, the viewpoint presented by the author is of a personal nature.
Exit mobile version