This article is written by Monalisha Jana of Adamas University, School of law and justice, An intern under legal Vidhiya.
ABSTRACT: –
The present study experimentally investigated about the present models of the statutory interpretation in terms of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights. The European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights have been widely regarded as fit for their respective purposes. These models provide frameworks for judges to interpret statutes and conventions effectively, ensuring uniformity in the interpretation and application of EU law in the case of the ECJ and the protection of human rights within the Council of Europe member states in the case of the ECtHR.
KEYWORD: – ECJ, European Court of human right, judicial activism, member-state preferences
INTRODUCTION: –
Statutory interpretation is a process by which court interpret and apply legislation. Statutory interpretation in the context of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is a crucial aspect of their legal systems. Both institutions play a significant role in interpreting and applying the law within the European Union and the Council of Europe respectively. These courts interpret legal texts, they contribute to the development of legal principles and doctrines that govern the legal order of their respective jurisdictions. ECJ is responsible for interpreting and applying European Union (EU) law. Statutory interpretation involves determining the meaning and scope of legislative provisions to ensure consistent and effective application of the law. The ECJ employs a purposive approach to statutory interpretation, taking into account the objectives, context, and principles of EU law. The European Court of Human Rights plays a crucial role in interpreting and applying the European Convention on Human Rights within the Council of Europe. The European Court of Human Rights allows the court to adapt its interpretation to changing societal values and ensure the effective protection of individual rights.
The present models of statutory interpretation arise from the complexity and evolving nature of European law. Critics argue that a more active approach may undermine democratic principles by allowing judges to make policy decisions that should be left to elected representatives.
- Present models of statutory interpretation in the European Court of Justice
Present model of the statutory interpretation followed by the ECJ is based on firstly, Text, context, and purpose of European Union (EU) law. The ECJ considers the wording of the legal provisions, the overall objective of the EU law, and its context within the EU legal framework. This model emphasizes the uniform interpretation and application of EU law across member states. It’s-s allows the ECJ to take a proactive role in shaping the development of EU law and ensuring its effectiveness. The court aims to ensure the consistent interpretation and application of EU law, which often requires an active approach by the judges.
Secondly, it’s based on the teleological approach and it commands a prominent place in the Court of Justice’s interpretative methods. It involves interpreting and applying European union (EU) law by considering the objectives, and principles of the European Union. This approach aims to achieve the goals of EU integration, harmonization, and the effective functioning of the EU institutions. This approach allows for a more active interpretation by the judges to promote EU integration and the effective functioning of the internal market. It allows the judges to go beyond the strict literal meaning of the legislation and consider the broader context and goals of EU law. This enables them to interpret the law in a manner that advances the objectives of EU integration, harmonization, and the protection of fundamental rights. It promotes legal certainty and consistency in the application of EU law and crucial for the function of EU legal system.
There are some criticisms that ECJ’s approach sometimes leads to judicial activism, where the court expands the scope of EU law beyond its original intent. This can be seen as an overreach of judicial power and a departure from the principle of confining the judiciary’s role to interpreting the law rather than making new law. This is seen as an overreach of judicial power, with the court effectively making new law rather than simply interpreting it.
- Models of Statutory Interpretation in the European court of human right
The European court of human right model of statutory interpretation is primarily based on the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The European Court of Human Rights, which enforces the European Convention on Human Rights, is the best-known body of the Council of Europe. The Council of Europe (COE) is an international organisation founded in the wake of World War II to uphold human rights, democracy and the rule of law in Europe. The European court of human right approach is characterized by a strong focus on protecting human rights and ensuring their effective implementation. The court takes into account the evolving social and legal context when interpreting the European court of human right, which allows for a more dynamic and active approach. This places a strong emphasis on safeguarding fundamental rights and freedoms enshrined. The European court of human right active approach is seen as essential for protecting individuals’ rights in cases where national authorities may not adequately uphold or enforce human rights standards.
There are some criticisms that European court of human right active approach can be seen as judicial activism, where the court exceeds its role of interpreting and applying the Convention and instead engages in law-making. This criticism suggests that the European court of human right sometimes goes beyond the original intent of the Convention and expands human rights protections beyond what was originally intended by the drafters. And also active approach can overburden national legal systems. The court’s expansive interpretation of human rights can result in a flood of cases and place a heavy burden on national courts to comply with the European court of human right judgments, potentially causing delays in the resolution of cases at the domestic level.
- Evaluation of Fitness for a More Active Approach
- The ECJ’s role is to ensure the uniform interpretation and application of EU law, while the European court of human right mandate is to interpret and apply the European Convention on Human Rights. The present models of statutory interpretation in both courts are designed to fulfill their respective legal mandates effectively.
- The European court of justice and European court of human rights have different purposes. The ECJ aims to promote the functioning of the internal market and the integration of member states by ensuring the uniform interpretation and application of EU law. The European court of human right focuses on protecting human rights and ensuring their effective implementation. The present models of statutory interpretation in both courts align with their purposes and contribute to fulfilling their respective missions.
- A more active approach can arise from the evolving nature of the legal and societal landscape. Both the European court of justice and European court of human right may need to adapt new challenges, emerging issues, and changing societal values. And also it allows the courts to respond effectively to these developments and ensure the continued relevance and effectiveness of their jurisprudence.
- Both the European court of justice and European court of human right must respect the sovereignty and decision-making authority of member states. While a more active approach may be warranted in certain situations, it is crucial to avoid overreach and respect the margin of appreciation given to member states.
- The present model of statutory interpretation followed by the European Court of Justice is generally deemed effective in achieving its purpose of ensuring the uniform interpretation and application of European Union law. The European Court of Justice meticulously analyzes the language, context, and purpose of European Union law to provide consistent interpretations that apply across all member states. This approach helps to establish legal certainty and a level playing field for businesses and individuals operating within the European Union.
- The European court of human right is also generally effective in achieving its purpose of protecting human rights and ensuring their effective implementation. The European court of human right adopts a dynamic and purposive approach to interpret the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. This approach allows the court to adapt to evolving societal values and address emerging human rights issues.
- The ECJ, s model of statutory interpretation is crucial for the functioning of the internal market and the integration of member states. It promotes the harmonization of laws, prevents fragmentation, and ensures the effective implementation of EU law. By interpreting EU law uniformly, the ECJ contributes to the stability and predictability of the EU legal framework.
- The statutory interpretation of European court of human right helps to safeguard fundamental rights and freedoms within the jurisdiction of the Council of Europe member states. It plays a crucial role in holding states accountable for human rights violations and providing effective remedies for individuals whose rights have been violated.
- The models of statutory interpretation in the European Court of Justice and European court of human right allow for flexibility and adaptability to address evolving legal and societal challenges. Both courts take into account the changing social, political, and legal landscape when interpreting statutes and conventions.
The European Court of Justice and European Court of human Right generally provide the necessary flexibility and adaptability to address evolving legal and societal challenges. The European Court of Justice and European Court of human Right are generally deemed fit for deducing a more active approach when necessary. These models align with the legal mandates and purposes of the courts, provide flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances, maintain legal certainty, and respect national sovereignty. However, the courts must be cautious not to overstep their boundaries and should carefully consider the implications of an active approach on legal predictability and democratic decision-making.
Conclusion: –
The present models of statutory interpretation in the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights are generally considered fit for their respective purposes. These models provide the necessary framework for the courts to interpret statutes and conventions effectively, ensuring the uniform interpretation and application of EU law in the case of the European Court of Justice and the protection of human rights within the Council of Europe member states in the case of the European court of human right. The present models of statutory interpretation also demonstrate flexibility and adaptability, allowing the courts to address evolving legal and societal challenges. This adaptability enables the courts to respond to emerging issues, uphold human rights standards, and ensure the continued relevance and effectiveness of their jurisprudence.
REFERENCES
- https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1526&context=ilj visited by 29\07\2023
- https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/216908204.pdf visited by 30/07/2023
- https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/constitutional-law/why-are-rules-of-interpretation-law-essays.php visited by 30/07/23
- https://euaa.europa.eu/easo-annual-report-2018/12-jurisprudence-court-justice-eu visited by 30/07/2023
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_and_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights#:~:text=ECJ%20gives%20the%20European%20Convention,guide%20its%20decision-making%20process Visited by 31/ 07/2023
- https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/216908204.pdf visited by 30/07/2023
- https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/brexit/what-is-the-european-court-of-justice-and-why-does-it-matter#:~:text=Located%20in%20Luxembourg%2C%20the%20ECJ,judges%20from%20all%20member%20states. Visited by 31/07/2023
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Court_of_Human_Rights#As_a_court_of_the_Council_of_Europe visited by 31/07/2023
