Site icon Legal Vidhiya

CRIMINAL DEFAMATION: FREE SPEECH V. REPUTATION

Spread the love
  1. INTRODUCTION 

The Freedom of Speech and Expression is a fundamental right envisaged under the Indian Constitution for the Indian citizens. However, this freedom is not absolute but is subject to certain reasonable restrictions, one of which is defamation. When words cross their line from fair comment to assail the dignity, the law of criminal defamation steps in to protect the reputation and dignity of the person. It holds the person accountable for the misuse of their freedom of speech and thereby raises a pressing question: How to balance the freedom of speech with the need to protect one’s reputation and dignity? 

The Indian Constitution guarantees to every Indian citizen the Freedom of speech and expression and also limits it by way of reasonable restrictions. Defamation is one such restriction, which is recognized as an offence under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023(hereinafter referred to as “BNS”). This means that if a person steps on your dignity, under the guise of free speech, then you may charge such person for the offence of criminal defamation.

The Right of Free Speech empowers the Indian citizens to present and express their opinions, exchange their ideas, question the authority without fear. This freedom is the bedrock of the Indian democracy as it helps to hold the public servants and officials accountable for their actions and question their acts. On the other hand, the law of criminal defamation helps to safeguard the person’s reputation and dignity by penalizing the publication or expression of the derogatory statements thus, helping to regulate the freedom of speech. 

  1. LEGAL BACKGROUND

The Freedom of Speech and Expression is a fundamental right enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. This Article gives freedom to each and every citizen of India to express themselves, subject to the reasonable restrictions as laid down under Article 19(2). These restrictions are:-

  1. Interest of sovereignty and integrity of India
  2. The security of the State
  3. Friendly relations with the Foreign States
  4. Public order
  5. Decency or morality
  6. Contempt of the court
  7. Defamation
  8. Incitement of an offence.

The restriction of defamation, as a criminal offence, is laid down under Section 356 of BNS. This section provides a shield for protecting the reputation of the person. It penalizes the act of making or publishing any imputation concerning a person, by words—spoken or written—or by signs or visible representations, with the intention, knowledge, or reason to believe that it will harm such person’s reputation.

  1. Section 356(2) BNS:- Punishment for Defamation.
  2. Section 356(3):– Punishment for printing or engraving the defamatory matter knowing or having reason to believe it to be defamatory.
  3. Section 356(4):– Punishment for selling printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter after knowing it to contain such defamatory material.

There are ten exceptions to the offence of defamation laid down under Section 356 BNS:-

  1. Imputation of truth for public good
  2. Public conduct of the public servant
  3. Public conduct of the public person other than the public servant
  4. Comment on cases, the conduct of witnesses and others concerned in the case.
  5. Merits and decisions and judicial proceedings
  6. Opinion on merits performance of any author in good faith
  7. Censure by the person in authority on the conduct of other, in good faith.
  8. Complaint to any authority 
  9. Imputation for the protection of interest
  10. Caution in good faith 
  1. KEY POINTS

Here is what this freedom and right means in your life:- 

  1. REAL LIFE APPLICATIONS

Following are some examples of free speech and when that free speech transforms into defamation:-

Whenever you feel like your reputation is being damaged by false imputations, allegations, or rumors, you can use this right as a shield.

  1. LEGAL REMEDIES
  1. LANDMARK JUDGMENTS
  1. ONGOING DEBATE OF DECRIMINALISING DEFAMATION

There is an ongoing debate world-wide on whether the criminal defamation should continue to exist or it should be treated only as a civil wrong. Many countries, including United Kingdom, New Zealand, USA, have decriminalized defamation and treat it only as a civil wrong. Treating it only as a civil offence implies that compensation can be claimed for defamation from the person who defamed but he will not be sentenced to imprisonment for the offence of defamation.

Critics in India argue that the criminalization of defamation violates one’s fundamental right of free speech and have chilling effects on it, especially for those who speak truth. While, the supporters argue that the law helps to protect the reputation and dignity of an individual which is the part and parcel of Article 21 of Indian Constitution. Perhaps the Indian judiciary and legislature will look into the necessity of criminal defamation in light of global trends

CONCLUSION 

Understanding Article 19 of the Indian Constitution along with the Defamation laws is crucial. The Freedom of Speech and Expression acts as your shield to express your opinion fearlessly, while the law of defamation is the safeguard of your reputation and dignity in the society. Understanding both helps you to express yourself fearlessly while not harming other’s reputation and dignity.

The debate between free speech and the defamation laws is not about choosing one over the other but balancing both. A democracy flourishes when the people are free to express themselves and criticize the people in authority but it collapses when the reputation of people are not safeguarded

In today’s era of technological advancement, where the rumors spread like fire, it is crucial to understand the freedom of speech and expression along with the law of criminal defamation. Speak with dignity, defend your dignity if harmed, and respect the boundaries which these laws have set. A responsible citizen not only exercises his rights correctly but also protects the rights of others. He takes them as their own duty to not to infringe the legal rights of others.

  1. REFERENCES 

Written by Jagriti Handa, student of Panjab University Swami Sarvanand Giri Regional Centre, Hoshiarpur, Punjab, and an Intern under Legal Vidhiya. 

Disclaimer: The materials provided herein are intended solely for informational purposes. Accessing or using the site or materials does not establish an attorney-client relationship. The information presented on this site is not to be construed as legal or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon for such purposes or used as a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney in your state. Additionally, the viewpoint presented by the author is personal.

Exit mobile version